<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Rebecca Cusey</title>
      <link>http://www.squarelens.net/</link>
      <description>TV. Work. Life. Blog.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:08:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2ysb5-20051201</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Clearly, we need a raise</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>At the Saddleback forum Saturday night, Presidential candidate&nbsp;Barak Obama said that saying when he thought life begins is &quot;above my paygrade.&quot; Which got me thinking, what's above my paygrade?</p><p>1) Caring about the new 90210 spin-off.</p><p>2) Watching &quot;rhythmic gymnastics.&quot;</p><p>3) Assessing whether, as per Section 658D(b)(1)(A) of the Act,&nbsp;the Lead Agency&nbsp;did &quot;administer, directly, or through other governmental or non-governmental agencies&quot; the funds received. Assessing compliance with the regulations at 45 CFR 98.11 which provide that, in addition to retaining &quot;overall responsibility&quot; for the administration of the program, the Lead Agency must also (among other things): Promulgate all rules and regulations governing the overall administration of the CCDF program; Ensure compliance with the approved Plan and all Federal requirements; Oversee the expenditure of funds by subgrantees and contractors.</p><p>4) Sorting socks.</p><p>5) Patrolling the streets of Baghdad. (Which should certainly be a higher pay grade.)</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/clearly_we_need_a_raise.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/clearly_we_need_a_raise.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:08:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Other Fallout of Saddleback</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In addition to McCain exhibiting unexpected gravitas, there was another turning point in evidence last night at the political forum at Saddleback Church. We witnessed a changing of the guard from the old political evangelical leaders: Dobson, Robertson, Falwell, et all. Those of us in conservative Evangelicalism (a shrinking bunch) have known that a leadership vacuum has existed for some time, and Rick Warren finally stepped full into that space. He presented a new face of Evangelicalism, one that is essentially good-natured and fair, asking the same questions of both candidates, willing to hit them both with hard issues, and more broadly focused than only on religious issues. As CNN political analyst Candy Crowley said, &ldquo;And also what's interesting here to me just as a forum, and that is that we didn't hear, you know, what's your favorite bible passage? What do you think about church? How do you like your sermons? There were religious things as you noted, but there were also a number of things about taxes, what's worth dying for. So it was far less about religion and a lot more about values. I think people got a real sense of maybe how these two men think.&rdquo; At the same time, he didn&rsquo;t throw out the baby with the bath water. He asked about the two traditional big issues, abortion and gay marriage. But he also wanted to know about poverty. Warren&rsquo;s most passionate moment with either candidate was when he asked about adoption and emergency legislation to attack orphan-hood worldwide. Each time when he asked that question, he choked up a little bit. No one can accuse him, at least fairly, of caring only about the unborn child and not the poor already born ones. He has the credentials to back it up, too, with a massive church mission to the people of Rwanda. <p>The structure of his encounters, asking the same set of questions to each candidate independently, was revolutionary. Although the press was skeptical before, it was positively laudatory after. Warren presented the religious community as intellectual, or at least not anti-intellectual. Perhaps most importantly, Warren came across as anything but arrogant. With a nod to the Evangelical leaders of the past and the work they did in the political realm, Warren was a breath of fresh air for which we&rsquo;ve been waiting a while. </p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/the_other_fallout_of_saddlebac.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/the_other_fallout_of_saddlebac.html</guid>
         <category>Faith</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:06:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Dara Torres: What if?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Dara Torres, the Olympic swimmer who at age 41 won three silver medals against swimmers <img height="300" hspace="5" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/oly_a_torres1_sw_sq_300.jpg" width="300" align="right" vspace="5" border="0" />half her age in Beijing, has competed in five Olympics. She is tied for the most medals won by an American woman. But, based on her age and skill, she could have competed in seven Olympics and most likely cinched the medal record. </p><p>She is also a mother to a toddler, Tessa. &quot;I'm gonna tell her how much she was a part of this.&nbsp; The sacrifices, the hard work, but still trying to balance the motherhood...I just know it's going to be so much fun when she finally can understand, and I can share all of this with her,&quot; said Torres.</p><p>I wondered as I watched her accept the silver medal: Is her life with five Olympics, twelve medals, and a daughter richer and more fulfilling than her life would have been with seven Olympics, more medals, and no child? </p><p><span class="ca">AP Photo/Mark J. Terrill</span></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/dara_torres_what_if.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/dara_torres_what_if.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:59:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>China&apos;s Girl Problem</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img title="Left, Agence France-Presse; Right, Zhou Liang/Xinhua" height="165" alt="Left, Agence France-Presse; Right, Zhou Liang/Xinhua" hspace="3" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/12singer2-600.jpg" width="300" align="left" vspace="3" border="0" />China has a girl problem. Like a bad boyfriend, the government whispers sweet promises to women and then does them wrong. The Communist country claims modern and perfect equality between the sexes but treats some more equally than others. Silver-voiced Yang Peiyi had a round face and crooked teeth, so they substituted winsome Lin Miaoke to <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gvdGdbFHvF8M_eJh8CSMEIbZ8tFAD92H7U480" target="_blank">lip sync Yang's voice</a> for the Opening Ceremonies. So much for a woman's or girl's value being equal, based on their service to their country, unless you count&nbsp;beauty as service to the Motherland. Your services are not required, Unattractive Comrade. (I actually think she's a normal, cute seven year old.)</p><p>&nbsp;<em>photo: Left, Agence France-Presse; Right, Zhou Liang/Xinhua</em></p><p>The case of the <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/olympics/2008/writers/selena_roberts/08/13/china.gymnasts/?bcnn=yes" target="_blank">gold-winning Chinese gymnastics</a> team is no better. Admittedly, gymnasts tend to be tiny and underdeveloped, but if those girls are 16, I'm 22. (I'm not, and haven't been for some time.) Besides the obvious cheating issues, the Chinese, if the suspicions are true, are ignoring rules that were put in place to protect the athletes from injury to their developing bodies and overtaxation of their immature psyches. </p><p>China's totalitarian Communist government&nbsp;demonstrates&nbsp;no respect for women, but a willingness to use them and abuse them to the state's own ends. The women of China should break up with this jerk of a government.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/thank_heaven_for_little_chines.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/thank_heaven_for_little_chines.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:30:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>What&apos;s Important in a Church?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img height="283" hspace="3" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/photo1.jpg" width="212" align="left" vspace="3" border="0" />Last Sunday, the fam and I attended <a href="http://squarelens.net/blog-mt/www.cornerstonesimi.com" target="_blank">Cornerstone church in Simi Valley</a>, pastored by Francis Chan. The large church has an energy and a passion about it that is infectious. With a total budget of almost $8 million, it gives half of that money to direct ministry to the suffering both here and overseas: World Impact, serving the inner city; Rescue Missions, serving the homeless and substance addicted;&nbsp;A dedicated prison&nbsp;pastor; an orphanage and school in Uganda; Children's Hunger Fund; Medical mission in Ethiopia.&nbsp;The list goes on. One of the most impressive things to me is that the church is choosing to not build itself&nbsp;a large building, although the congregation has expanded greatly, so that they can set up a center for distributing food and other items to those who need it. To me, this is faith in action. I would be excited to be a part of it.</p><p>You knew there was a &quot;but&quot;, right? The service was uplifting, although the congregation was prone to game-day style applause, until the sermon. Chan's wife Lisa gave the talk and it was about wives submitting to their husbands. Her interpertation was that men make the decisions and wives, unless being asked to directly sin, follow joyfully. Not particularly nuanced. No discussion of culture or varied interpertations, or even the husband loving the wife as Christ loves the church. </p><p>The church in America&nbsp;has been down this road before. I have to think there is more richness, more life, more fullness to the marriage partnership than arguing about who gets to be boss.&nbsp; A team, say a water polo team (I've been watching the Olympics), doesn't waste time debating. They put the best person for the job in position and get to work to score points and push the other team under the water. Aren't we in a marriage a team with common goals (minus the drowning&nbsp;the opposition&nbsp;part)? Shouldn't we be each other's biggest cheerleaders as well? </p><p>Anyhoo, it's not the issue itself that bothers me. I don't consider it an essential issue to the Christian faith. Important, but not a deal-breaker. I can see myself perhaps going to a church in which I don't see eye to eye.&nbsp;The stickler is&nbsp;the anti-intellectual tone to it, the &quot;Just do it&quot; sermon without much context or explanation. The whole thing struck me as fundie-brainless.</p><p>I want to be part of a church that is dynamic and active in living out its faith, challenging consumerism to put its money and its energy to serve God by serving others. That's something I can sign on to. What's important in a chuch? Is the Sunday service key? The details of theology? Or its role in the community and the world? Which would you choose?</p><p>P.S. If you're not a person of Christian faith but have bothered to read this post, I'd love your thoughts. We're an insular bunch. Outside perspective is helpful.</p><p><em>photo: African children from <a href="http://www.cornerstonesimi.com/thepoor/" target="_blank">Cornerstone's photo project</a>. Copyright Cornerstone Community Church</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/whats_important_in_a_church.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/08/whats_important_in_a_church.html</guid>
         <category>Faith</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:32:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>No Girls in Bubbles</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>One year ago, at the press tour 2007, the CW threw a party in which, for reasons that were doubtless impeccable, they had women doing yoga inside giant inflated spheres. The spheres were in a fountain. The women were dressed in white unitards with bright green wigs. It was quite a sight.</p><p>I mention it only to say that didn't happen this year. No oxygen bars either. No martini slides made of ice. No Cuban artisans hand rolling cigars. This press tour was pulled together in haste with networks still reeling from a strike and eager to cut back. Most of the parties resembled a large, crowded, and expensive wedding reception. A notable exception was the FOX party at the Santa Monica pier. FOX rented out the entire small broadwalk park. Except for the fans clinging to the fence and begging for autographs, the park is restricted to the beautiful people. And critics.</p><p>ABC/Disney hosted its party in a ballroom of the hotel. They turned it into a pseudo-lounge with square couches and prickly, funky, leafy flower arrangements that towered over our heads. The Emmy nominations had been announced that morning. Krisitin Chenoweth bubbled with excitement at her Emmy nomination for Best Supporting Actress in a Comedy. She said we could look forward to more singing from her lovelorn character in Pushing Daisies. She stood arm in arm with co-castmember Ellen Greene. Teri Hatcher from Desperate Houswives wisely sat on a couch and let the press come to her while the kids from Camp Rock tore up the dance floor.</p><p>An offsite club was the setting for a combined CBS, Showtime, and CW party. The outdoor area around a fountain was standing room only. We had to push through the crowd, a worrying enterprise when some of the actresses look like they could snap if you bump into them. Elizabeth Reaser, who stole the show as amnesia patient Rebecca/Ava on Greys Anatomy last season, now has her own show called The Ex-List. She redates all her lost loves after a psychic tells her she has already dated the love of her life. Reaser was utterly charming with a mix of excitement and nervousness.&nbsp; Also present was the cast of the new 90210 revival, because it's time to go back to Beverly Hills.</p><p>NBC hosted a party out in a hotel courtyard with colorful lanterns strung over our heads and a surfing themed photo station. I spoke with Zach Levi, star of Chuck. Levi is a self-professed Christian. We joked that we needed a secret handshake. &quot;I'll just draw half a fish on the ground,&quot; he said, pawing the astroturf with his toe. </p><p>Next year, barring any strikes or acts of God, perhaps there will be girls in bubbles.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/no_girls_in_bubbles.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/no_girls_in_bubbles.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:24:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>I&apos;m back</title>
         <description><![CDATA[You know how when people have a blog and then they stop blogging and then they come back and they're all &quot;I got stomach flu&quot; or &quot;My daughter had her eye infection return and I had to take her to the doctor and miss time at the TCA press tour&quot;? I hate that.]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/im_back.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/im_back.html</guid>
         <category>Life</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:23:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>For all three of you Scrubs fans out there.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Neil Flynn disclosed the name of his character, &quot;The Janitor.&quot;&nbsp;</p><p>NEIL FLYNN: I can tell you my name right now. It's<br />Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/for_all_three_of_you_scrubs_fa.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/for_all_three_of_you_scrubs_fa.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:16:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Checkpoint Cha-Cha</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>There are opportunities life hands you only once. True love. Buying into the ground floor of Nike. And being taught to Cha-Cha by Edyta Sliwinska and Alec Mazo of <em>Dancing with the Stars</em>. <img height="280" hspace="3" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/alec-mazo-edyta-sliwinska.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="3" border="0" />As two dear friends pointed out to me, sometimes you have to seize life by the horns, shoot for the moon, sleep with the fishes. Wait, wrong metaphor, but you get the idea. The women lined up on one end of the dance floor, the facing the men. We all tried to put disturbing wedding dance floor memories out of our minds. And then the lesson began.</p><p>One two. Cha-cha-cha.</p><p>Back step. Cha-cha-cha. (forward if you're a guy.)</p><p>Turn around. Cha-cha-cha.</p><p>Sounds simple, right? It is when they do it slowly and count for you. When they crank up the music (pretty much the fastest beat they could find, I'm thinking), pandemonium broke out. Edyta&nbsp;managed to both&nbsp;cha-cha-cha and&nbsp;fling her hips around while keeping her arms in a graceful arc.&nbsp;I managed to lurch somewhat on the beat. Many critics were like me, but others were passable. One TV critic in a flowing blue dress glided around with Derek Hough, being dipped, lifted,&nbsp;and spun. An older critic deftly guided his partner around the floor. Clearly, he'd practiced beforehand. Cheater. </p><p>That was not me. My light footed partner quickly and suavely got the beat. I think he has Latin blood. But I backed up when I should have cha-cha-ed. I brought the point of my heel down squarely on the foot of the critic behind me. He was very nice and there wasn't much blood, so I think it's ok. I heard it was only a few stitches. </p><p>There goes my Dancing with the Critics career.</p><p><em>photo: Edyta Sliwinska and Alec Mazo, courtesy of ABC</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/checkpoint_chacha.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/checkpoint_chacha.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:14:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>For All you Dancing Fans out there...</title>
         <description>In four minutes, ABC will host a dinner with Dancing with the Stars. Supposedly, they&apos;re going to try to teach us to dance. We&apos;re not a nimble bunch as a rule. Too bad video cameras are banned. I&apos;ll let you know how it goes.</description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/for_all_you_dancing_fans_out_t.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/for_all_you_dancing_fans_out_t.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:54:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Deep Scientolopockets</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So, in a former blog post, I made fun of a certain church which I won't mention, but starts with Scientol and rhymes with crapology. Read the post <a href="http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/and_now_for_something_complete.html">here and watch the videos</a>. They'll blow your minds. Apparently, the Scientolobots online found me and are posting ads on my site.</p><p>&lt;---------- There. (but maybe lower down or higher up. I'm not a gosh-darn techie)</p><p>Do NOT click on these links. I won't be held responsible for what the Scientolobots will do to you or your computer if you click on them. </p><p>Do I still get paid for the ad if I tell people to not click on the link?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/deep_scientolopockets.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/deep_scientolopockets.html</guid>
         <category>Celebrity</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:23:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Boss, Man, Boss Man</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A gaggle of sweaty TV critics descended on the set of Mad Men yesterday. (The A/C on the bus was, uh, ineffective.) A few donned pinstripe suits to fit in to the sophisticated&nbsp;'50s/'60s vibe of the period drama.&nbsp;<img height="267" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/betty.jpg" width="269" align="right" border="0" /></p><p>Mad Men centers on the lives of hard drinkin', driven, sometimes brooding advertising executives in the 60s and the women who type their letters and bear their children. It's the kind of tightly focused, well acted, well written drama that makes critics want to forcibly enter peoples' homes, wrestle away their remote, and switch the channel to this well done show. </p><p>The show makes every attempt to authentically recreate the world of the late '50s, early '60. Children climb around in moving&nbsp;cars, pregnant women drink Highballs, and everyone smokes as if it were their own personal crusade to pollute the air of New York.</p><p>The set is no different. As you wander through the Sterling Cooper offices, it looks as if an entire 1959 office just popped out for a long lunch. Cigarette butts spill out of ashtrays, many marked by lipstick. Old typewriters display half written letters. Abba Zabba candy bars rest on the snack cart. If the view out the window wasn't a painting, you'd believe you were there.</p><p>Don (Jon Hamm)&nbsp;and Betty (January Jones)&nbsp;Draper's house has the same kind of attention to detail. Everything on the cluttered kitchen counter or in the fussy bedroom screams &quot;1950s money.&quot; It was your grandma's house, if your grandma was a wealthy white woman living in a suburb.</p><p><img height="267" hspace="3" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/peggyandpete.jpg" width="269" align="left" vspace="3" border="0" />We spoke with Elizabeth Moss, who plays naive young secretary Peggy. She showed us Peggy's new, semi-private office. She said that once her unmarried character had a baby, she heard from fans who had also had similar experiences. She had no idea how prevalent her situation was. Vincent Kartheiser, who plays up-and-coming adman Pete Campbell discussed the generation gap on the show. &quot;Pete is more of a modern man,&quot; he said, &quot;and Don and the others are dinosaurs.&quot; According to IMDB, Kartheiser was a history major at UCLA, so this job is right up his alley. He spoke of &quot;Kennedy men&quot; vs. &quot;Nixon men.&quot; In his mind, these two men represented grand American archetypes of the era, something that would be fun to further&nbsp;discuss with him&nbsp;over beers. Or perhaps highballs.</p><p>Finally, we walked through the costume department, full of slick suits for the men and silk party dresses for the women. It reminded some of us of our grandmothers and other of their mothers. </p><p>If you like good drama, it's a show worth watching. The new season premieres Sunday, July 27 at 10/9c on AMC. </p><p><em>Photos: January Jones as Betty Draper (top). Elizabeth Moss and Vincent Kartheiser (bottom) as Peggy Olson and Pete Campbell. All photos courtesy of AMC</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/boss_man_boss.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/boss_man_boss.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:42:55 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>FOX in pictures</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>FOX presented its shows on Monday and capped the evening with a party at the Santa Monica pier. </p><p>But first, FOX is winning the shoe wars. After a few days of PBS and cable with their sensible shoes, Leona Headey of The Sarah Connor Chronicles rocked these totterers. </p><p><img height="382" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/tca0708_ttscc_164O2716.jpg" width="242" align="middle" border="0" /></p><p><em>Lena Headey, photo courtesy of&nbsp;FOX</em>&nbsp;</p><p>It's hard to make out, but the spiky heels are about three inches high. Way to go, Lena.</p><p>Everybody's favorite CTU agent Jack Bauer (aka Keifer Sutherland) showed up. I post this picture only because I was off somewhere to the right, crammed up against someone's back and holding my voice recorder in the direction of what I hoped was Keifer's mouth. I have no idea what he said, but it was exciting.</p><p><img height="437" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/tca0708_24_0051.jpg" width="653" border="0" /></p><p><em>Keifer Sutherland, photo courtesy of&nbsp;FOX</em>&nbsp;</p><p>Then it was off to the Santa Monica pier, where FOX put on a party and invited us to ride the roller coaster with its stars. Not that we did that, of course. But I did get to convince Tahmoh Penikett to ride the bumper cars. (He plays Helo on Battlestar Galictica and was there because he will be on FOX's Dollhouse.) Here's the cast of House cutting loose at the pier, or at least appearing to do so.</p><p><img height="437" src="http://www.squarelens.net/images/tca0708_party_0041.jpg" width="653" border="0" /></p><p><em>HOUSE cast members Olivia Wilde, Kal Penn and Peter Jacobsen, photo courtesy of FOX</em></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/fox_in_pictures.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/fox_in_pictures.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:05:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Beliefnet Blog: Dispatch from the TV Critics&apos; Association Press Tour</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Just beyond the storied pool at the Beverly Hills Hilton, the television networks are busy parading their new shows to the nation's TV critics. Diverse luminaries from Benjamin Bratt to Ludacris to Spike Lee, mill around in the halls and answer press questions, while newsman Bob Woodruff and rocker Tommy Lee check in via satellite. </p><p><a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/idolchatter/2008/07/dispatch-from-the-tv-critics-p.html" target="_blank">Read more of my post at Beliefnet.com</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/beliefnet_blog_dispatch_from_t.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/beliefnet_blog_dispatch_from_t.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:21:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Out of Context Words of Wisdom from TCA</title>
         <description><![CDATA[&quot;You don't want to spend too much time in the time travel rabbit hole.&quot; - James Middleton of The Sarah Connor Chronicles]]></description>
         <link>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/out_of_context_words_of_wisdom.html</link>
         <guid>http://squarelens.net/blog/2008/07/out_of_context_words_of_wisdom.html</guid>
         <category>Television</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:05:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
